In
1896, Charles Sheldon, the minister of the Congregational Church in Topeka,
Kansas, wrote a novel entitled, “In His Steps.” That novel popularized the use
of the question “What would Jesus do?” as a tool for making moral decisions.
This question stuck around among Christians after that time and then enjoyed a
big resurgence in the 1990’s through church youth groups. It has remained very
popular ever since.
As
surprising as this may sound, though, I think the popularity of this question
overshadows an even better question that we could ask when facing moral
dilemmas. Now, don’t me wrong—“What would Jesus do?” is certainly a fine
question. It’s a far better question than “What would feel the best?” or “What would
offer the path of least resistance?” Nevertheless, I think the question suffers
from some drawbacks—some that stem from our response to the question, and at
least one that stems from the question itself. What are these drawbacks?
1.
We often assume we already know Jesus well enough to answer the question
Many
people would say they’ve got a good grasp of what Jesus was all about—at least
in His personal interactions, anyway. “He was all about being nice and polite,
right? Inviting children to sit on his lap and what not.” If we already know
Jesus so well, there doesn’t seem to be any need to take another, closer look
at His example before we decide what He would do. But this is precisely where
we take a massive wrong turn.
In
this day, when only 32% of regular churchgoers read the Bible everyday1,
we’d better pause and think before we claim to know Jesus well. Have you ever
read one of the Gospels all the way through? How about all four of them? They
don’t all contain the same stories, so it’s important to read them all. If you
haven’t done so yet, are you sure you know Jesus well enough to state what He
would do?
If
we try to decide what Jesus would do without cracking open the Bible and
thinking long and hard about the question, the decision we reach could be far
off the mark.
2.
We over-emphasize some of Jesus’ actions and teachings and neglect others
Let’s
face it—Jesus was a complex individual. We would not have predicted that all of
His sayings or all of His actions would have come from the same person. The
same Jesus who said He was gentle and lowly in heart (Matthew 11:29) also said
that He came to cast fire on the earth and wished it was already kindled (Luke
12:49). The same Jesus who took children in His arms to bless them (Mark
10:13-16) also chased other people with a whip because they desecrated a holy
place (John 2:13-17).
It
takes great care and deliberate effort not to create a one-sided caricature of
Jesus, but many times that’s exactly what we end up with in our minds. We tend
to highlight the sayings and actions that we’re comfortable with and all but
ignore the ones that make us squirm. But if we don’t consider the full range of
Jesus’ words and deeds when we try to follow His example, how confident can we
be in our declarations about what He would do?
3.
The question runs the risk of downplaying the uniqueness of Christ
When
we ask “What would Jesus do?” there seems to be an assumption that we can think
along exactly the same lines as Jesus; that we can weigh exactly
the same considerations that He would. But for all the ways in which Jesus was
similar to us, He was still different from us in some highly important ways. On
some occasions, He took the actions that He did because He knew the inner
thoughts of others (think of the healing of the paralytic in Matthew 9) or
because He knew the future (think of Christ’s delay in traveling to Bethany
before raising Lazarus in John 11). And I hardly need to mention Christ’s
ability to do miracles!
Those
differences present some difficult hurdles to jump in our efforts to decide
what Jesus would do in our present-day situations. I don’t know the inner
thoughts of others; I don’t know the future. How do I know that Jesus wouldn’t
have made a very different decision than me based on His knowledge of
information that isn’t available to me?
A
better question
“What
would Jesus do?” can be a fine question IF the preceding drawbacks are kept in
mind. Obviously, we want to imitate our Lord as much as we can! But I think
there’s an even better question that deserves more of our attention. It is not
“What would Jesus do?” but rather “What did Jesus command?” Or even better yet,
“What did Jesus and His hand-picked representatives command?” We’ve got to
bring the writings of the Apostles into our decisions; after all, they are the
ones whom Jesus commissioned to make disciples and “teach them to observe all
that I have commanded you (Matt 28:20).” He promised that the Holy Spirit would
guide them into all truth (John 16:13), so we have it from Jesus that we better
listen to what the Apostles had to say.
Commands
offer us much greater clarity than an example ever could. The example from a
person’s actions can be difficult to apply from one situation to another—even
when we know that all of a person’s actions were morally perfect, as in the
case of Jesus. But commands, by their very nature as directives, point us very
clearly in the right direction. Yes, we will still have to sort through some
questions about the precise steps that we should take, but commands make
the general outline of the path very clear.
So
as you make your decisions, I would encourage you to give your primary focus to
the commands of Jesus rather than His actions. Actions can be helpful
illustrations of a command, and thus we can and should learn from them, but
commands offer greater clarity. So lock in on the commands of Christ and His
Apostles!
References:
1.
https://factsandtrends.net/2019/07/02/how-many-protestant-churchgoers-actually-read-the-bible-regularly/
No comments:
Post a Comment