As the
father of a toddler, I’ve been hearing the song “Jesus Loves Me” quite a bit
lately. In fact, Adrianna wants to hear that song at bedtime every night, so I
hear it at least once a day! The first line of that song makes a very important
claim, one that many people today would reject. That line says, “Jesus loves
me, this I know, for the Bible tells me so.” That may seem like just a simple
children’s song, but its actually making an astounding claim—that we can know
that a statement is true simply because the Bible says it is.
That is a
very significant claim, and its one that most people today would reject. In
fact, many Christians are not willing to give whole-hearted approval to the
claim that we can know that a statement is true simply because the Bible says
it is. It is not popular in the culture at large to place that kind of
confidence in the Bible; thus, it can be tempting for us to hesitate to place
our full confidence in Scripture.
So, should
we be willing to say, “this I know, for the Bible tells me so?” Do we have good
reasons to be so confident about what the Bible says? Today, I hope to convince
you that the answer is “yes!” We’re going to look at a few of the most commonly
asked questions about the Bible, and in my opinion we will find some very
satisfying answers. These answers will take the form of an acronym that spells
out the word MAPS, so that this little memory device will help you remember
these answers whenever these questions might come up.
Let’s begin with
a question that is common to virtually everyone who doubts the reliability of
the Bible.
How do we know the Bible hasn’t
been changed over the years?
Virtually
everyone who wants to challenge the reliability of the Bible will claim either
that the Bible was deliberately changed at some point in the past or that it
has simply picked up thousands of errors as it was copied over the years and
thus can no longer be trusted. You will hear this claim from atheists on the
one hand all the way to Mormons and Muslims on the other! So how do we know the
Bible hasn’t been changed over the years? The answer is the word manuscripts.
The “m” in that word gives us the first letter of our acronym.
Manuscripts
are the ancient, handwritten copies of the Bible that we have discovered
through archaeology. These manuscripts are copies of the original writings that
were meticulously copied and handed on from person to person and group to
group. For the Old Testament, these manuscripts were copied by a group of Jewish
scholars known as the Masoretes. These scholars took their work seriously—they
knew how many letters were in each line, how many lines were to be on each
page, and if they made a mistake they threw out the whole thing. Their work was
so precise that when the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered around 1950, they
confirmed that the Masoretes work was nearly flawless.
In the case
of the New Testament, archaeologists have uncovered literally thousands upon
thousands of manuscripts—far more, in fact, than any other ancient work of
literature. The New Testament, as you might know, was originally written in
Greek, and if we consider only the Greek manuscripts that we have found, we
have over 5,000 manuscripts to work with—which is about 8 times more than the
number of manuscripts that have been found of any other ancient book (#2 on the
list is the Iliad by the Greek poet Homer). Archaeologists have found some
copies of the New Testament that date to within 35 years of when the Book of
Revelation was written. If that sounds like a long time, its not! In this field
of study, 35 years is like a couple of days.
But, if we also count the
manuscripts that we have found that were copied into other languages, like
Latin, we have over 24,000 manuscripts to work with! Manuscripts of the Bible
have been found all over the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe, and when we
compare them to each other, we find that the text of the Bible has always been
consistent—there is no evidence at all of any sort of vast conspiracy to
corrupt the Bible.
Now as far as the question of
errors and mistakes in copying, it is true that these individual manuscripts
have copying mistakes in them—a misspelled word here or there, or a word
accidentally left out of a verse (you would make mistakes, too, if you were
copying the entire New Testament by hand!). But, when we compare all of these
manuscripts together, it is easy to spot these mistakes and ensure that they
don’t creep in to our copies of the Bible today. The copy of the Bible that you
hold in your hand is the result of painstaking work to compare all of the
copies of Scripture we possess in order to root out the copying mistakes that
were made. So you can confidently say that your Bible is not filled with
mistakes and errors; instead, it contains precisely what the original authors
of Scripture wrote with their own hands.
How do we know the events
written about in the Bible actually happened?
The answer
to this question is the word “archaeology,” which gives us the letter “a” in
our acronym. As archaeologists have done their work over the years, they have
repeatedly found that the historical details recorded in the Bible are accurate
and true. For example, archaeologists recently
discovered coins from ancient Egypt that bore the name and image of the
biblical character Joseph from the book of Genesis. One coin apparently also
made reference to the dream that he interpreted for Pharaoh.
We could
mention thousands of other discoveries as well. Many cities and towns mentioned
in the Bible have been found. Some of them are still being lived in, like
Jerusalem, which still contains artifacts like the aqueduct built by King
Hezekiah of the Old Testament or portions of the Temple in which Jesus walked
and talked (perhaps you’ve heard of “The Wailing Wall”). All of these
discoveries reveal that the people and places of the Bible were real people and
real places.
Let’s
compare this for a moment to another religious book—the Book of Mormon. That
book makes all kinds of claims about people who supposedly lived in North
America many years ago and who became the ancestors of modern-day Native
Americans. Archaeologists have never made a single discovery that backs up the
story of the Book of Mormon. In fact, you won’t find maps in the back of the
Book of Mormon like you do in the Bible because they can’t be produced! Mormons
just have to guess about where those people supposedly lived because we haven’t
found any proof that they actually existed.
This
observation raises serious doubts about everything that’s found in the Book of
Mormon. If it can’t get the facts of history straight, why should we trust
anything else it says? Perhaps you can see then how archaeology gives us
confidence in the Bible. To paraphrase Jesus, since the Bible is accurate about
earthly things that we can confirm through disciplines like archaeology, then
we have good reason to trust it when it tells us about heavenly things—like the
character of God and salvation.
How do we know that the Bible is
more than just the writings of human beings?
It is
certainly true that the Bible didn’t just fall from the sky into our hands. The
words of Scripture were actually written down on paper by human beings. But if
that’s the case, then how can we claim that the Bible is anything more than
just the opinions of human beings? Does it actually bear the mark of a divine
origin?
Yes it
does, and we can see this in two ways, which will give us the last two letters
of our acronym. The first mark of divine origin is predictive prophecy, which
gives us the letter “p.”
You might
be familiar with the fact that the Bible has made certain predictions about
future events, but what you may not realize is how specific some of these
prophecies are. In general, the Bible’s prophecies are clear enough that their
interpretation is obvious, and they could easily be proven wrong if they didn’t
come true. Let me give you an example of what I
mean—if I said, “We’re going to get an inch of snow tomorrow,” by the end of
the day tomorrow it would be easy to prove whether or not my prediction had
come true. But if I said, “A wintery sky will arise,” it would be more
difficult to tell whether or not my prediction came true. What does a
“wintery sky” even mean? Does it mean cold winds? Cold air temperatures? Also,
it wouldn’t be particularly noteworthy to predict a wintery sky in December!
Such a prediction wouldn’t show any special insight on my part.
Most
so-called “prophets” over the years have given only vague prophecies like my
wintery sky prophecy. Nostradamus is a great example of such a prophet. Every
so often, you’ll see a supermarket tabloid declaring that Nostradamus predicted
some kind of world event, but when you read the so-called “prophecy,” its so
vague that you could interpret it in a dozen ways.
The
prophecies of the Bible are very different. Many of them are very specific, and
the fact of the matter is that they have come true. Some of the prophecies even
give the specific names of kingdoms and people. [READ
Daniel 8:20–22] [READ Isaiah 44:24–28]
We can also
look at the numerous prophecies that were fulfilled by the Lord Jesus. By some
counts there were hundreds of prophecies that his life fulfilled, with such
specific details as the name of his birthplace, the content of his personal
character, and the treatment that he would receive in his crucifixion, burial,
and resurrection.
The fact
that the Bible has accurately and specifically predicted future events before
they took place is a powerful proof that it is supernatural in origin. It could
not possibly be a merely human book because human beings do not have the
ability to predict the future with such accuracy.
The second
mark of divine origin is statistics, which gives us the letter “s” in our
acrostic. The unique circumstances behind the way that the Bible was written
simply defy all odds. The probability that we would even have a book like the
Bible is all but impossible. Consider this: The Bible
was written over a period of more than 1500 years on 3 different continents by
40 different authors from at least 19 different walks of life, yet it contains
one continuous storyline and no contradictions. Most of these authors did not
know each other and they were not working in collaboration.
It is not
as though the authors of the Bible got together in Jerusalem one day and came
up with a plan for their writing. They worked independently of each other, yet
their writings show complete agreement with the writings of all of the other
authors. If we didn’t have a book like the Bible, I doubt we would believe that
such a book could even exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment